View Your Shopping Basket
Home
About
Contact
Sample Essays
Custom Essays
Sell Your Essay
Become A Researcher
Links
Accounting
Administrative Law
Admiralty Law
Alt. Dispute Resolution
American Studies
Asylum
Bar Course
Broadcasting Law
Business Computing
Business Studies
Carriage of goods by Sea
Childcare Law
Cinema
Civil Justice
Civil Liberties
Civil Litigation
Civil Process
Commercial Arbitration
Commercial Law
Commercial Litigation
Company & Business Law
Company Law
Comparative Law
Computing & Business
Computing Law
Conflict of Law
Constitutional Law
Consumer
Consumer Law
Consumer Studies
Contract Law
Corporate Governance
Corporate Strategy
Criminal Justice
Criminal Law
Criminal Litigation
Criminal Procedure (USA)
Criminology
Critical Legal Studies
Development Studies
E-Commerce
Economics
Education
Education Law
Election Law
Employment Law
Engineering
English
English Legal System
Entertainment Law
Environmental Law
Environmental Management
Equal Rights & the Law
Ethnic Minorities & the Law
European Law
Evidence
Export Law
Family Law
Finance Law
Financial Economics
Franchising
French Law
Gender Studies
Geography
German Holocaust
German Law
Health & Safety
Healthcare
History
Housing
Human Resource Management
Human Rights
Human Rights: Childcare Law
Human Rights: Civil Liberties
Iirsh Constitutional Law
Immigration & Nationality Law
Information Technology
Insurance Law
Intellectual Property
International Affairs
International Sales of Goods
International Trade & Banking
International Trade & Business
Internet Computers & Business
Jurisprudence
Land Law
Law and Society
Legal Aid
Legal History
Legal Method
Legal Skills
LPC - Commercial Litigation
LPC - Wills and Probate
LPC Business Law
LPC Civil Litigation
LPC Company Law
LPC Conveyancing
LPC Course
LPC Criminal Litigation
LPC Legal Research
LPC Scottish Law
Management
Management Accounting
Marine Insurance
Maritime Law
Marketing
Marking Guide
Maths
Media
Media Studies
Medical
Medical Law
Mental Health
Miscellaneous
Model Question & Answer Pack
Modern Political History
Mooting
Music
Nursing
Penology
PHD Proposals
Philosophy
Philosophy of Law
Physics
Planning Law
Police
Politics
Politics of human rights
Psychology
Public International Law
Public Law
Race Relations
RELIGION
Roman Law
Scottish Law
Shipping Law
Social Policy
Social Science
Social Security
Sociology
Spanish Law
Sport and the Law
Statistics
Taxation
Theology
Tort
Tourism
Trusts
Welfare Law
Women & the Law
 
   
 
Essays on Evidence
 
Problem Question Evidential Issues for Rape. PACE. Inconsistent statements ID Evidence. Character Evidence*** 2000 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Burdens and Standards No Copy of the Problem Question*** 2000 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Problem Question on admissibility of evidence and criminal justice Act 1988 Question 2 *** 2500 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Evidence, competence, compatibility 2118 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Problem Question Ben and Andrew Murder, possession of fire arms, no licence, rape. Judges direction to jury. Character evidence. Witness conduct.*** 2880 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Problem question. Giving evidence. Murder. Bob, Terry, Thelma, Sonia. Telephone call to police 2200 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Problem question, advising the prosecution bout calling witnesses to give evidence. Issues: Hearsay, admissibility under criminal justice Act 1988 the exceptions under res Gestae and dying delegations. 2200 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
* Admission of evidence, entrapment should courts be stricter…. Agent Provocateur *** 6450 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
‘It is important to arm an accused person with some protections to give credibility, if not substance, to the idea of the adversary system as a genuine contest.’ 3185 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
‘To what extent, and in what circumstances, will be evidence be excluded because of the manner in which it was obtained’. 2000 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
How effective is our adversarial system in protecting the innocent? 2197 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Thayer suggested that the law of evidence should be based on two principles: 1) that nothing is to be received which is not logically probative of some matter requiring to be proved; and 2) that everything which is thus probative should come in unless a clear ground of policy excludes it. Consider the extent to which these principles are reflected in the rules of evidence in England and Wales. Alternative answer to EV17 3400 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Thayer suggested that the law of evidence should be based on two principles: 1) “that nothing is to be received which is not logically probative of some matter requiring to be proved” and 2) “that everything that is thus probative should come in unless a clear ground of policy excludes it” Consider the extent to which these principles are reflected in the law of evidence of England and Wales. Alternative answer to EV16. 2500 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
“It is undoubtedly not competent for the prosecution to adduce evidence tending to show that the accused has been guilty of criminal acts other than those covered by the indictment, for the purpose of leading to the conclusion that the accused is a person likely from his criminal conduct or character to have committed the offence for which he is being tried. On the other hand, the mere fact that the evidence adduced tends to show that the commission of other crimes does not render it inadmissible if be relevant to an issue before the jury, and it may be so relevant if it bears upon the question of whether the acts alleged to constitute the crime charged in the indictment were designed or accidental, or to rebut a defence which would otherwise be open to the accuses”. Makin v AF for New South Wales (1894) Discuss the extent to which this still represents the law today.*** 4000 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
“R v Hunt (1987) takes insufficient account of the Woolmington policy or principle. Even in the straight forward context of questions about the incidence of burden of proof Woolmington has dual significance. It states a legal rule…But it also states a broader principle in relation to burden of proof. In my view their Lordships fail to accord appropriate and sufficient weight to that policy or principle.” Mirfield P. Discuss 1500 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Problem question – Advise Andrew. Charged under s.1 Prevention of Crime Act 1957. Primary facts. Judge’s direction. Evidential burden. Burden and standard of proof 900 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Four questions: 1) This question concerns the admissibility of improperly obtained evidence, 2) the admissibility of evidence before the jury hears about it. Abduction is a criminal offence therefore criminal law rules on evidence apply 3) Admissibility of hearsay, reference to expert witnesses 4) admissibility of evidence – reference to PACE 1984 2000 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
The admissibility of improperly obtained evidence 850 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Admissibility of hearsay, reference to expert witnesses 1150 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
In Boardman v DPP in 1975 Lord Hailsham described the law relating to similar fact evidence as a “pitted battlefield”. Is this description still appropriate today?*** 2000 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Forensic psychology: the detection of deception in children 3500 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Forensic psychology: discuss the effects of the investigating process on children, with particular emphasis on the complex issues raised for victims of intra-familial childhood sexual abuse. 3000 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Similar fact evidence 2000 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Similar Fact Evidence - teacher is charged with 2 offences of indecent assault committed on separate occasions against 2 pupils at the school*** 1400 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Problem question. Similar Fact Evidence. Will the evidence of each boy be admissible to support the other's complaint? 1400 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Discussion of changes to the notes of evidence which affect the protection to the accused. The answers deals with Hearsay, the police and criminal evidence Act 1984, similar fact evidence, the right to silence, the criminal justice and Public Order Act 1994. 4000 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Previous Convictions. The jury in any criminal trial should be told of all the previous convictions of an accused so that they may be able to assess properly his or her credibility as a witness 2900 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
The rule against admissible hearsay evidence has been justified by scholars and the judiciary for various and generally valid reasons. There has been a view that the application of the hearsay rule may at times lead to the inadmissibility of highly relevant and probative evidence. Critically examine this assertion, showing clearly the problem raised by inadmissible hearsay evidence and make concrete suggestions for reform of this area of law 2750 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Construct a Wigmorian chart of the Enc case which will then be a role played trial 6000 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Advanced criminal evidence, assessing the likelihood of a successful, appeal by George, cross examination 5500 words
Essay Cost: £30    
 
Records 1 to 30 of 45 Next Last